The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: FCC, The Regulatory Mix, Lifeline, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: The Regulatory Mix, Lifeline, Utah, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: The Regulatory Mix, USF, 911, Texas, Nevada
Last year, the Nevada PUC embarked on a "zero tolerance" policy for telecom carriers and other regulated utilities who filed late or incomplete annual reports, annual assessments, TDD surcharges, and CMRS (wireless) licensing fees. Based on a Staff Petition filed last August, the Commission issued an order to "show cause" why regulated companies who filed any of those reports/fees even a single day late or with just a small error or omission should not be fined or have their certificates revoked. Many companies filed comments in response to the show cause petition to plead their cases and demonstrate that they had come into compliance well prior to issuance of the petition. The comments had little to no effect and the Commission issued fines for all but a handful of the more than 100 companies on the show cause list.
Topics: telecom regulation, Compliance Reporting, PUC, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: operator services, FCC, The Regulatory Mix, Connect America Fund, VoIP, broadband, Compliance Reporting, regulatory monitoring, Nevada, Iowa
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: The Regulatory Mix, copper wireline, New York, telecom deregulation, Nevada
Topics: FCC, The Regulatory Mix, telecom regulation, regulatory monitoring, Nevada
A new law (effective May 24, 2013) in Nevada requires wireless
providers to provide, on request of a law enforcement agency, certain call
location information about their subscriber’s devices. To facilitate the
processing of such requests, wireless providers, including resellers, must also
provide emergency contact information to the Nevada Department of Safety.
Topics: wireless, telecom regulation, Nevada
Posted by Fran Martens
The interest rate to be paid on Nevada customer deposits for the period July 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, is 0.080%. Did you know that Nevada adjusts this rate twice each year; in December and in June? As a provider of telecom services, how do you keep your records up-to-date regarding the interest rate on customer deposits in all the areas where you provide service?
Topics: customer relations rules, Nevada
Topics: USF, VoIP, regulatory monitoring, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: FCC, The Regulatory Mix, Lifeline, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: The Regulatory Mix, Lifeline, Utah, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: The Regulatory Mix, USF, 911, Texas, Nevada
Last year, the Nevada PUC embarked on a "zero tolerance" policy for telecom carriers and other regulated utilities who filed late or incomplete annual reports, annual assessments, TDD surcharges, and CMRS (wireless) licensing fees. Based on a Staff Petition filed last August, the Commission issued an order to "show cause" why regulated companies who filed any of those reports/fees even a single day late or with just a small error or omission should not be fined or have their certificates revoked. Many companies filed comments in response to the show cause petition to plead their cases and demonstrate that they had come into compliance well prior to issuance of the petition. The comments had little to no effect and the Commission issued fines for all but a handful of the more than 100 companies on the show cause list.
Topics: telecom regulation, Compliance Reporting, PUC, Nevada
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: operator services, FCC, The Regulatory Mix, Connect America Fund, VoIP, broadband, Compliance Reporting, regulatory monitoring, Nevada, Iowa
The Regulatory Mix, TMI’s daily blog of regulatory activities, is a snapshot of PUC, FCC, legislative, and occasionally court, issues that our regulatory monitoring team uncovers each day. Depending on their significance, some items may be the subject of a TMI Regulatory Bulletin.
Topics: The Regulatory Mix, copper wireline, New York, telecom deregulation, Nevada
Topics: FCC, The Regulatory Mix, telecom regulation, regulatory monitoring, Nevada
A new law (effective May 24, 2013) in Nevada requires wireless
providers to provide, on request of a law enforcement agency, certain call
location information about their subscriber’s devices. To facilitate the
processing of such requests, wireless providers, including resellers, must also
provide emergency contact information to the Nevada Department of Safety.
Topics: wireless, telecom regulation, Nevada
Posted by Fran Martens
The interest rate to be paid on Nevada customer deposits for the period July 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013, is 0.080%. Did you know that Nevada adjusts this rate twice each year; in December and in June? As a provider of telecom services, how do you keep your records up-to-date regarding the interest rate on customer deposits in all the areas where you provide service?
Topics: customer relations rules, Nevada
Topics: USF, VoIP, regulatory monitoring, Nevada
Inteserra is your go-to source for all aspects of market entry, product planning, project management, and state and federal regulatory compliance. Through our unique combination of experienced consultants, who bring decades of relevant real-world expertise, and a variety of tools and publications, we can help your company understand the impact of regulatory changes and provide advice when answers are not clear.
151 Southhall Lane, Ste 450 Maitland, FL 32751
Copyright © 2021 Inteserra Consulting Group | Marketing | Contact Us
