FCC Agenda For December Meeting
The FCC announced the tentative agenda for its December 15, 2016, Open Meeting. The items are as follows:
In addition, the tentative agenda lists several items that are on circulation that may be considered, unless voted on circulation prior to the December Open Meeting. These include an Order on Improving the Resiliency of the Nation's Mobile Wireless Communications Networks, and a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning Non-geostationary, Fixed-Satellite Service Systems.
FCC Proposed $100,000 Forfeiture
The FCC issued a Notice of Apparent Liability For Forfeiture and Admonishment to World Discount Telecommunications Co., Inc. (WDT) for an apparent violation of the FCC’s universal service reporting obligations and for transferring, without prior FCC approval, certain assets, including its customer base. In proposing the $100,000 penalty, the FCC also considered the company’s past conduct in charging excessive USF fees to its international long distance customers. It admonishes WDT for its violations of the rule prohibiting excessive universal service surcharges that occurred outside the one-year statute of limitations. Specifically, the FCC found that WDT apparently billed customers for excessive and unlawful USF surcharges for international service for four years despite having no USF contribution obligation on those revenues as a result of the FCC’s Limited International Revenue Exemption (LIRE).
The $100,000 forfeiture was calculated as follows: $50,000 for failure to timely file an Annual USF Worksheet (499A) and $20,000 for the two unauthorized asset transfers (an upward adjustment from the standard forfeiture of $8,000 per unauthorized transfer.) The $70,000 total forfeiture was then upwardly adjusted again by $30,000 due to the improper collection of USF charges over a long period of time (which violations were outside the statute of limitations and for which forfeiture could not be assessed.) The FCC said that “[i]n no event should contributors impose USF costs on customers when they have no USF contribution obligation associated with the service being provided.”